I have enough trouble answering questions that are asked explicitly. Getting me to try to extrapolate questions from answers is an even riskier task. Windows Vista comes with improved protection of system files. You can read more about it here http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/evaluate/overvw.mspx and here http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/evaluate/feat/mngfeat.mspx . If you are the author of Incredimail, perhaps you can describe in more detail what you're doing; I can try to find somebody who can help you rewrite your installer to work with Windows Vista.
Raymond Chen - MSFT wrote:
Windows Vista comes with improved protection of system files.
I suppose "improved protection" is one way of putting it. While I am all for increased security I would have to label Windows Vista in it's present state as incredibly overly paranoid. It is always asking for permission to do just about any bloody thing you've already requested by clicking on a link/icon. The AntiVirus I've managed to install (avast!) always needs permission to run every time the OS boots. Although the default account setup is under the Administrators user group simple things like having the rights to change a desktop icon are denied. No...sorry....you have to do that logged on as administrator. What? You want to log on as administrator. Oh...you can only do that in safe mode.So far I see a looming IT support nightmare ahead =8-0
Cheers,
Feadan
P.S. No, Raymond, I don't have a question either. Just these general observations and loads of end user frustration.
After working in the IT industry for 14 years starting as a simple ISP tech working my way to current as a CIO for a Medical corporation I can honestly state that in Vista's current state (Build 5308) I would never deploy this in any of my facilities.
I use Microsoft and UNIX Sco and AIX systems for good reason, and dislike Macintosh for my own reasons, this OS resembles Mac OS 8 with its overly paranoid system settings but at least in OS 8 I could delete directories (Even if they didnt truly get deleted)
1: The Security Permissions are there for Administrative tasks, without them corporate environments could not function in network structures - Example: When I set permissions on a directory to allow full control for User1, Administrator, Domain Admins, DHCP Admins, and DNS Admins I want those permissions enforced. What I dont want is to set those permissions and then have windows deny the use of, deletion of, or modification of a file or folder.
2: This "Enhanced Security" is great for Client systems and Home users without computer knowladge - Well it would be if there were better ways to support the system.
3: These "Enhance Security" features also corupt Microsoft software such as Office 2003 (2 out of 4 OS instalations) One Note, Small Business Accounting, Viso, and Speach Recognition. But at least PGP works with this build.
Are you going to add in a Prefs folder so when someone calls my support desk people they can tell them to "Trash the Prefs and Reboot" ?