Seriously though, I'm not trying antagonize anybody, I'm just really wanting to hear why you all want a C# version :)
Examples:
'VB
Dim SomeCondition As Boolean = True
Dim MyArray(4) As String
Dim i As Integer
If SomeCondition Then
For i = 0 To MyArray.Length - 1
MyArray(i) = "cool"
Next
End If
//C#
bool someCondition = true;
string[] myArray = new string[5];
if (someCondition)
for (int i = 0; i < myArray.Length; i++)
myArray[i] = "cool";
Grrr, how about just the facts? Did Mike Kass get caught in a real world development pickle and the aforementioned C# version "with cool security features built in" (a.k.a. newer, better) isn't going to happen? Or should we take the pious bet and dare Erik to "simply" crank out a C# version himself for us unclean among him?!?! Awfully smug to say the code is the same except for the little stuff like the syntax?!?! *LOL* So we're to believe it would take a moderating giant only 10 minutes to do complete this? 15 minutes? Okay, Erik, go for it; show us how easy it is, please...
In the meantime, some of us have been quietly, anxiously waiting. Iraq happens; we don't need anyone's head on a pike pole and absolutely not pompous diatribes. It looks from the size of waffle iron here, that it's not going to happen. A simple yes or no will suffice. Is there still a chance the C# version is going to happen anything soon or not?
But there's another reason, when you're scanning code it's just a pain to have to convert the syntax into something that's more familiar and therefore it's harder to pick on the concepts being utilized. Sure it aint rocket science to do it - it just takes a little longer. It would be great to have the time to rewrite in your chosen language but most of us want it done for us so we can get on with our quicker.
Good job the C# version is just s few days away!
That's only true if you're using notepad to do your .NET development. If you're using VS.NET, then using VB.NET actually requires a LOT less typing ;) The fact that there's actually more text there in the end, is irrelivant.
<quote>
Awfully smug to say the code is the same except for the little stuff like the syntax?!?! *LOL*
</quote>
Basically...<a href="http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/webtech/012702-1.shtml">YES</a>, but I didn't say it wouldn't be time consuming. I'm saying that since the differences are just syntax, why not look at the code that's already there while you wait for the C# version?
Actually, it looks like TaskVision was written by someone who primarily uses C# (maybe not), but wrote it in VB.NET, because there are some suttle things in there that a "regular" VB.NET programmer probably wouldn't do.
<hr>
Thanx for your comments everyone...I was just curious and I hope no one took offense to what I said. I was just curious, that's all. I'll leave you alone now! ;)