An interesting survey: HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray

A survey fromhttp://www.dvdtown.com/announcement/hddvdsurveybyipsos/3665/

1. In response to the question “Which statement best describes how likely you would be to buy an HD DVD player,” respondents were over seven times more likely to buy an HD DVD player vs. a Blu-Ray player when all studios support both formats.

a. 57% would definitely or probably buy an HD DVD player vs. 8% for Blu-Ray.

b. 25% would definitely buy HD DVD vs. 2% for Blu-Ray.

2. Purchase interest in HD DVD remains three times higher than Blu-Ray -- even without HD DVD studio support from Disney and Fox.

a. 56% of respondents would definitely or probably buy an HD DVD player vs. 18% for Blu-Ray.

b. 20% would definitely buy HD DVD vs. 6% for Blu-Ray.

3. The main reason consumers prefer HD DVD over Blu-Ray is its superior value.

a. In response to the question, “Which statement best describes how you feel about the value of an HD DVD player,” nearly 57% of respondents indicated that HD DVD was a “very good” or “fairly good” value vs. 14% for Blu-Ray.

b. Conversely, 68% indicated that Blu-Ray was a “somewhat poor” or “very poor” value vs. 19% for HD DVD.

4. In the 4th quarter 2006, the quantity of titles in the HD DVD format is assumed to be two times more than Blu-Ray (200+ for HD DVD vs. approximately 100 for Blu-Ray).

[2098 byte] By [QimingLu] at [2008-2-7]
# 1

Blu-ray versus HD DVD: First Head-to-Head Comparisons

http://www.highdefdigest.com/feature_blurayvshddvd_firstcomparison.html

QimingLu at 2007-8-30 > top of Msdn Tech,Audio and Video Development,HD DVD Interactivity Authoring...
# 2
this survey was commissioned by Toshiba
thephrogg at 2007-8-30 > top of Msdn Tech,Audio and Video Development,HD DVD Interactivity Authoring...
# 3
What HD-DVD has going most for it is the name and speed to market.

I'm serious, I think the name is going to speak to the average consumer much more than Blue Ray does. Studios will follow the paying customer.

wmerydith at 2007-8-30 > top of Msdn Tech,Audio and Video Development,HD DVD Interactivity Authoring...
# 4

Sony has created another BetaMax product - apparently they don't learn from history and therefore are now doomed to repeat their mistakes of 30 years ago.

Nice Job guys...

possmann at 2007-8-30 > top of Msdn Tech,Audio and Video Development,HD DVD Interactivity Authoring...
# 5
excuse me for my ignorance, but does the HD-DVD format also use a Blue-Laser to read the disk?
NeederOfVBHelp at 2007-8-30 > top of Msdn Tech,Audio and Video Development,HD DVD Interactivity Authoring...
# 6
Yes, it uses a blue-violet diode, like Blu-ray.
PeterTorr-MSFT at 2007-8-30 > top of Msdn Tech,Audio and Video Development,HD DVD Interactivity Authoring...
# 7
So does this mean anything like microsoft are dumping the blu-ray idea because of the polls or is the blu-ray idea for microsoft products still open?
Gnasher155 at 2007-8-30 > top of Msdn Tech,Audio and Video Development,HD DVD Interactivity Authoring...
# 8

AT LAST MY SOFTWare IN READY

Blue-Ray and HD-DVD software is here

ONLY FOR WNDOWS VISTA BETA 2

i think blue ray disk will beat HD-DVD disk Why blue ray disk can hold up to 60 gig on the one disk other then HD-DVD disk can only hold up to 22gig

smash888 at 2007-8-30 > top of Msdn Tech,Audio and Video Development,HD DVD Interactivity Authoring...
# 9
In theory the capacity of Blu-ray is bigger than HD-DVD, in real life...not
The big problem with Blu-ray are the dual layer discs that aren't working properly
and the only place where you can replicate them is Sony Japan (so try to book a slot there ...)
So today HD-DVD has more capacity than BD.
And that is just one thing, Blu-ray fails in about every way ...
Have you already seen a forum like this on the Blu-ray side? I don't think we have to underestimate the influence
of the people who have to make these discs... Authoring HD-DVD is more developer friendly for current
SD DVD authors and authoring Blu-ray discs with Java simply means more time and budget (a few terms clients DO understand)
and maybe hiring a Java programmer. Replicating HD DVD's is also more simpler than BD.
And there aren't even decent working tools yet to author BD-J (the Advanced Content version of Blu-Ray)
Okay, on paper, Blu-ray promises a bit more but once everyone has tried to push the specifications to the limit
in the beginning and the HD dust settles, we'll be looking at a user friendly classic disc lay-out like we do today with standard DVDs,
using about 70% or so of the interactive capacity.

HD-DVD equipment is also half the price of BD and the European launch
of the PlayStation 3 (knighted as the big promotor of Blu-Ray) has been delayed from november 2006 to March 2007 (missing the
Christmas sales, ouch) with 500.000 units instead of 2 million like it was intended. And I won't be the first to buy a device that has already
got a history of technical problems...
I think HD-DVD is already a few miles ahead and I'm not the only one...

Here's what Ben Waggoner from Microsoft wrote (17 Aug 2006) at http://dvdlist.tully.com/ (log in required) and I totally agree :

"I think you're really underestimating our pessimism about BD as
a physical format. Honestly, in my opinion, and the opinions of those
who know much more about it than I do, the physical format is simply
bad. It was a reach-for-the-stars engineering effort, which
simultaneously bets on so many hard things going right at the same
time... Whatever one might think Blu-ray's advantages are, they certainly AREN'T in the real-world
arena of replicating discs. Microsoft's (healthy validated, at this
point) doubt about the practicality of BD replication was a big
motivator in our decision to support HD DVD (not that I was at Microsoft
then).

There were three things that folks were really betting on for
Blu-ray to win the whole game in 2006.

1.More titles due to more studio support.
2.Better discs due to greater capacity
3.More players due to PS3

And today?

1.More titles released for HD DVD, and more titles on the release
schedule. The BD "exclusive" studios haven't done anything yet. And
only Sony has a vested interest in who wins.

2.HD DVD discs are getting stellar reviews, while BD discs are
getting slammed. HD DVD wins today on capacity, video codec, audio
codecs, and interactivity. BD discs are struggling to match the DVHS
experience. All known BD-50 titles have been pulled from the release
schedule.

3.Even though BD has launched much more recently, the Toshiba
player is outselling the Samsung by a healthy margin of units. PS3 has
already been delayed for 6 months this year, and had a lot of promised
features dropped. Xbox 360 will have a HD DVD player option available
this year as well. I personally expect there to be more Xbox 360 owners
playing HD DVDs than PS3 owners playing BD on Christmas Day this year.

Sure, on paper BD looks great. But we want something that looks
good on a shiny disc, and BD has manifestly failed to prove they can
deliver this."

GerritL at 2007-8-30 > top of Msdn Tech,Audio and Video Development,HD DVD Interactivity Authoring...