Speed, speed, speed

One of the key reasons we use desktop search is for speed in finding things. I've been using WDS since it's first release but I found that X1 was faster at finding things and displaying results and showing previews. I've also recently seen Copernic and it was much faster. I think a key issue here is speed, speed, speed, and if I didn't mention it speed! For example, OL 2007 now uses WDS. I find it terribly slow finding a contact name. I can find a contact faster on my Windows Mobile device. I expect my desktop, with it 1 GB of memory and 3GHz HT CPU to be faster at this stuff then my handheld.
[617 byte] By [PCause] at [2008-3-7]
# 1

Hello P Cause,

Thank you for the feedback. Have you tried the new beta 2 release of WDS 3.0? You may find that product more to your liking.

Paul Nystrom - MSFT

PaulNystrom-MSFT at 2007-10-8 > top of Msdn Tech,Windows Search Technologies,Windows Desktop Search Help...
# 2
I was using beta 2 when I posted. It is certainly better than 2.6.5 but not where Copernic is yet. To paraphrase a famous saying: "You can never be too fast or too small".
PCause at 2007-10-8 > top of Msdn Tech,Windows Search Technologies,Windows Desktop Search Help...