SQL 2005, Clustered FullText dependencies?

After installing SQL Server 2005 on a cluster, I notice that the cluster resource "SQL Server FullText" has a dependency on disk H.
Disk H was the disk I chose for Data Files during install.

I would have expected the dependency would be "SQL Server" as it was in SQL 2000.

Is this a bug?

I took a random database and added a Full Text Catalog. In the Browse section, I chose a clustered disk other than H (namely F) for the Catalog Location.

So should the FullText resource now have a dependency on the F-disk as well?

[581 byte] By [JFoushee] at [2007-12-24]
# 1
Fulltext is cluster-aware in sql2k5 and it must be located on the shared disk. If you do not specify the INPATH value during the catalog creation, the default path (set at setup time) will be used.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189520.aspx

oj at 2007-10-8 > top of Msdn Tech,SQL Server,SQL Server Database Engine...
# 2
Right, but do I need to be concerned about a FullText Catalog created on a shared disk that is not a FullText-resource dependency?
JFoushee at 2007-10-8 > top of Msdn Tech,SQL Server,SQL Server Database Engine...
# 3
There has to be a dependency. This allows sqlserver to correct mount the fts after failover/back.
oj at 2007-10-8 > top of Msdn Tech,SQL Server,SQL Server Database Engine...
# 4

Well, no there's not. I added Disk F to the SQL Server dependency list.

Again, out of the box, the FullText resource just has a dependency on the H-drive as installed.
I would have expected the FullText resource to have a dependency on the SQL Server resource (where I set my disk dependencies), which was the behavior of SQL 2000.

I posted this dilemma to the Microsoft Feedback Center and their answer was "This is by design." Design of the product or the install? Oh well, I guess it works.

JFoushee at 2007-10-8 > top of Msdn Tech,SQL Server,SQL Server Database Engine...

SQL Server

Site Classified